Drawing for E-BUSINESS MAGAZINE

USPTO serial 75445462

E-BUSINESS MAGAZINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E-BUSINESS MAGAZINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LUCILLE NICHOLS

LUCILLE NICHOLS DARBY & DARBY PC805 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Magazines in the field of on-line commerceACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, providing on-line magazines in the field of online commerceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 19, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 5, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 14, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance