Drawing for BEST WINGS USA

USPTO serial 75445612

BEST WINGS USA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, ROBERT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEST WINGS USA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHARLES E BAXLEY

59 JOHN ST 5TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10038UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029cooked poultry in International Class 29ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 29, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 26, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 19, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 31, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 8, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 30, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance