Drawing for INSIGNIA

USPTO serial 75446294

INSIGNIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INSIGNIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linda M. Byrne

LINDA M BYRNE MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016bank checks, checkbook covers, address labels, accounting journals, bookkeeping journals, and other check-related parts thereofACTIVE—
035mail order services featuring bank checks, checkbook covers, address labels, accounting journals, and bookkeeping journalsACTIVE—
042printing services, namely, printing of personalized bank checks and address labelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 11, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 11, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 12, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 12, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 1, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 27, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 27, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 26, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance