Drawing for ORGANIC PRIDE

USPTO serial 75446504

ORGANIC PRIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CROWE, ROBERT J.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORGANIC PRIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dorie G. Choderker

DORIE G CHODERKER LOEB & LOEB LLP10100 SANTA MONICA BLVD STE 2200LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030donut mixes, cake mixes, muffin mixes, brownie mixes, danish mixes, bread mixes, roll mixes, croissant mixes, cinnamon roll mixes, pancake mixes, bagel mixes, biscuit mixes, cornbread mixes, cookie mixes, pretzel mixes, churros mixes, pizza dough mixes, glaze mixes, icing mixes, hot chocolate mixes, cappuccino mixes, ice cream mixes, coatings for frying and baking meat, fish, poultry and vegetables, tempura batter, sugar, coating sugars, flour and rice flour all made from organically cultivated and/or organically processed ingredientsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 19, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 6, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 12, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 20, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 18, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 24, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 18, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Sep 15, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 9, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance