USPTO serial 75446522
PENISSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, WILLIAM D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PENISSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | medical device, namely, a hollow penis-shaped device worn over the penis for treatment of prostate disorders, impotence and other sexual disorders, and for the prevention of the transmission of sexually transmitted diseases | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |