Drawing for IN THE KITCHEN WITH ROSIE

USPTO serial 75446574

IN THE KITCHEN WITH ROSIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IN THE KITCHEN WITH ROSIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANDRES J GALLEGOS

ANDRES J GALLEGOS MANDEL LIPTON AND STEVENSON LIMITED203 N LASALLE STE 2210CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded video and audio tapes featuring cooking informationACTIVE—
016Recipe books; books and pamphlets containing catering plans; printed restaurant menusACTIVE—
021Kitchen utensils, namely, spatulas, whisps, ladles; non-metal containers for household or kitchen use; cookware, namely, pots and pans; beverage glasswareACTIVE—
024Textile napkins; linen tableclothsACTIVE—
025ApronsACTIVE—
030Prepared meals consisting of primarily of pasta or rice prepared; ketchup, mustard, relish, spice, flavoring additives for non-nutritional purposes, seasoning; food, namely, salad dressing and saucesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 28, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 6, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 28, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 29, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 27, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 30, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 27, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance