USPTO serial 75446627
EPOQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EPOQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
V T GIORDANO
V T GIORDANO VON MALTITZ DERENBERG KUNINJANSSEN & GIORDANO60 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10165Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | AUTOMOBILES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |