USPTO serial 75447938
NIKE GRIND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NIKE GRIND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beaverton, OR
Beaverton, OR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHY J MCKNIGHT
KATHY J MCKNIGHT SHAW PITTMAN POTTS & TROWBRIDGE2300 N ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-1128UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | SPORTING GOODS, NAMELY SPORTS BALLS OF ALL TYPES; HAND GRIPS FOR GOLF CLUBS, BASEBALL BATS, SOFTBALL BATS, CRICKET BATS, FIELD HOCKEY STICKS, ICE HOCKEY STICKS, LACROSSE STICKS AND SPORTS RACKETS OF ALL TYPES; MITTS AND GLOVES FOR THE PRACTICE OF ALL TYPES OF SPORTS; SNOWBOARDS; SKATEBOARDS; AND PADDING AND CUSHIONING USED IN SPORTS FACILITIES AND ON EQUIPMENT FOR BASKETBALL, BASEBALL, FOOTBALL, SOCCER, HOCKEY, LACROSSE, ICE SKATING, INLINE SKATING, CRICKET, VOLLEYBALL, AND IN GYMNASIUMS AND PLAYGROUNDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 13, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |