USPTO serial 75448089
WINGS ALLIANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THAYER, GARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WINGS ALLIANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen C. Lee
STEPHEN C LEE ESQ FISH & RICHARDSON PC3300 DAIN RAUSCHER PLZ60 S SIXTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Northwest Airlines, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Northwest Airlines, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WINGS ALLIANCE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 12, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 8, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 5, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |