Drawing for INLINE BETON

USPTO serial 75448288

INLINE BETON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INLINE BETON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARTIN R GREENSTEIN

MARTIN R GREENSTEIN TECHMARK55 S MARKET ST 16TH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Protective clothing, in particular protective helmetsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely shirts, pants, shoes, hats, jackets, sweatshirts, sweaters and parkas, for general wear and for wear while inline and roller skatingACTIVE—
028Sporting articles, in particular skateboards, inline skates, rollerskates, elbow and knee protectorsACTIVE—
041Planning and organization of events, in particular sports eventsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 21, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 200144DDSEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED—
Sep 10, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 28, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 19, 20011.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Jul 18, 2001CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 2, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance