USPTO serial 75448333
MAY THE BEST IDEA WIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAY THE BEST IDEA WIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER D KEIRS
CHRISTOPHER D KEIRS MSC 110701COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPP O BOX 692000HOUSTON, TX 77269-2000Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | technical support services; namely, offering advice regarding the use and function of computer hardware and software and computer network integration; providing technical consultation and information by facsimile machine featuring computer product specifications, configurations, settings and features; subscriptions to a computer database on CD-ROM featuring technical information relating to the configuration, use and repair of personal computers, file servers, modems, network interface cards, network hubs, network routers, network switches and disk drive arrays; and, providing remote diagnosis of computer hardware and software configuration problems using electronic means such as computers, modems and telephone lines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |