USPTO serial 75449012
DANCE DOCTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DANCE DOCTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pacific Palisades, CA
Pacific Palisades, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOEL E SIEGEL
JOEL E SIEGEL WOOD, PHILLIPS, KATZ, CLARK & MORTIMERCITICORP CTR STE 3800500 W MADISON STCHICAGO, IL 60661-2511Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toys and games, namely, dolls, action figurines, and dance competition skill and board games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 16, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |