USPTO serial 75449163
BAKERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3875198Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 16, 2010
- Examiner
- LOWRY, LEIGH A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BAKERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Louis, MO
Webster Groves, MO
North Miami, FL
St. Louis, MO
St. Louis, MO
St. Louis, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta Jacobs-Meadway
ZIGI USA LLC ZIGINY14205 NE 18th AveNorth Miami, FL 33181UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, hats, belts, socks, shoes, scarves, tights, shoe inserts, namely, cushioned heel inserts, and non-slip pads for application to the soles of shoes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bakers Footwear Group Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BAKERS 2013, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ZIGI USA LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Edison Brothers Stores, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Bakers Footwear Group Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Bakers Footwear Group Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named BAKERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 16, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 4, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 30, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2005 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 8, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |