USPTO serial 75449172
SCREENING ROOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCREENING ROOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JASON D FIRTH ESQ
JASON D FIRTH ESQ STEINHART & FALCONER LLP333 MARKET ST STE 3200SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2150UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing online entertainment in the nature of films, movies, film clips, television clips, music, and soundtracks on-demand | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2001 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |