USPTO serial 75449460
RACE SERIES VANTAGE RT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RACE SERIES VANTAGE RT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID J POWSNER
DAVID J POWSNER NUTTER, MCCLENNEN & FISH LLPONE INTERNATIONAL PLBOSTON, MA 02110-2699UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT FOR IMAGE PROCESSING AND COMPONENTS THEREOF, NAMELY, SYSTEM BOARDS, MEMORY MODULES, DAUGHTERCARDS, COMPUTE NODES, INPUT/OUTPUT INTERCONNECT MODULES, IMAGE PROCESSING MODULES, DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING MODULES; SOFTWARE FOR EXECUTION THEREON; AND INSTRUCTIONAL BOOKS AND MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITH | ACTIVE | Feb 26, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named RACE SERIES VANTAGE RT
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 28, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |