USPTO serial 75450545
FUTUREBALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUTUREBALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD L STEVENS
RICHARD L STEVENS SAMUELS GAUTHIER STEVENS & REPPERT225 FRANKLIN ST STE 3300BOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | vehicles, namely, a sphere-like motorized vehicle | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | papers and paper articles, namely, advertising materials, brochures and posters | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Furniture in Class 20 | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely, hats, t-shirts and jackets | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Beer in Class 32 | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | advertising of a sport where vehicles compete against one another as teams pursuant to a standard set of rules and conducting the promotion, organization and exhibition of games based on competition between vehicles pursuant to a standard set of rules | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | disseminating information via the media and the print trade regarding information, exhibitions and games between vehicles competing against one another as teams pursuant to a standard set of rules | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | entertainment, namely, providing sporting contests between vehicles on teams competing according to a standard set of rules for public entertainment and education, namely, disseminating information regarding new sporting contests between vehicles operating under a standard set of rules | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Futureball, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named FUTUREBALL
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |