Drawing for FORECAST ENGINE

USPTO serial 75451194

FORECAST ENGINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAFORTE, RENE M.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FORECAST ENGINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS M COESTER

THOMAS M COESTER BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042interactive on-line financial services, namely, financial planning, investment analysis and consultation and portfolio allocation offered via a global computer networkACTIVEFeb 23, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 10, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 10, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 11, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 26, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 26, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 23, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 4, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance