Drawing for ATTACHE

USPTO serial 75451723

ATTACHE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ATTACHE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carole F. Barrett

CAROLE F BARRETT HOWARD RICE ET ALIATHREE EMBARCADERO CTR 7TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4024UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035travel management services, namely, consulting and reporting to corporate customers regarding business travel expenses of their employeesACTIVE—
039travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for passenger air and train travelACTIVE—
042travel agency services, namely, making reservations and booking hotel accommodations for travellers; and personal services, namely attending to errands for travellersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 2, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 10, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 30, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2002PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Jun 6, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Dec 11, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 13, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 8, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance