Drawing for INNOVA CONTEMPO CLASSIC

USPTO serial 75451846

INNOVA CONTEMPO CLASSIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALT, JILL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INNOVA CONTEMPO CLASSIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GERALD M KRAAI

GERALD M KRAAI LATHROP & GAGE LC2345 GRAND BLVD 23RD FLKANSAS CITY, MO 64108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021stainless steel, aluminum, and other metallic cookware, namely, saute pans, steams, and poach inserts, multi-use pots, clam pots, windsor pans, lasagna pans, paella pans, teakettles, griddles, stockpots, colander lids, roasters, frypans, saucepans, chafing dishes, bowels, measuring beakers, cooking oil sprayers, chicken fryers, ceiling racks, wall racks, grills, kitchen tool sets (utensils), and flatwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 30, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 6, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance