USPTO serial 75452837
ODOR GUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2633743Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 15, 2002
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ODOR GUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toledo, OH
Toledo, OH
Toledo, OH
TOLEDO, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD R FRASER
DONALD R FRASER FRASER MARTIN & MILLER LLC28366 KENSINGTON LNPERRYSBURG, OH 43551UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | TOILET BOWL DEODORANT DISPENSER SYSTEMS COMPRISING AUTOMATIC DRIP DISPENSERS, ATTACHMENT HARDWARE, AND LIQUID CONCENTRATES FOR USE IN URINALS AND TOILET BOWLS IN COMMERCIAL WASHROOMS, SOLD TO JANITORIAL AND SANITARY SUPPLY COMPANIES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Impact Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Impact Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Impact Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by IMPACT PRODUCTS LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named ODOR GUARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 23, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |