USPTO serial 75452838
STACK RACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STACK RACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD G. MARTIN
RICHARD G MARTIN MACMILLAN SOBANSKI & TODD LLC132C W 2ND STPERRYSBURG, OH 43551-1401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Liquid dispensing system consisting of plastic shelves, dispensing containers, trigger-operated spray bottles, and color coded labels for use in dispensing pre-measured liquid concentrates or ready to use chemicals, for use in the janitorial maintenance of commercial buildings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 25, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 3, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |