USPTO serial 75452933
EXECUTONE STORK INFANT SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWITZER, SANDY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXECUTONE STORK INFANT SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN P DEMM
STEPHEN P DEMM HUNTON & WILLIAMSRIVERFRONT PLZ E TWR951 E BYRD STRICHMOND, VA 23219-4074Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | infant surveillance, locating, and events processing system for use by hospitals and health care providers, comprising infrared transmitters and sensors, radio frequency transponders and antennae, visual and audible alarms, pagers, video cameras, electric door locks, and computer software to perform infant surveillance functions, to monitor the location of infants, mothers, caregivers and other personnel within a hospital facility and to integrate, monitor and control use of the foregoing infant surveillance system | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EXECUTONE Information Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by EXECUTONE Information Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named EXECUTONE STORK INFANT SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 14, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |