USPTO serial 75454051
SPECTRUM BANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2361187Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 27, 2000
- Examiner
- KULICK, LIZBETH B
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SPECTRUM BANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montebello, CA
Montebello, CA
Montebello, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM G. LANE
WILLIAM G LANE WILLIAM G LN INC16485 LAGUNA CANYON RDSTE 250IRVINE, CA 92618Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CHECKING ACCOUNTS, SAVINGS ACCOUNTS, MONEY MARKET ACCOUNTS, CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT, INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS, BUSINESS LOANS, PERSONAL LOANS, CREDIT CARDS, ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER, SAFE DEPOSIT BOXES, AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE SERVICES, AND TELEPHONE BANKING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2005 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 15, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |