Drawing for MC2

USPTO serial 75454326

MC2

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2533210Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 29, 2002
Examiner
STRIEGEL, ADAM
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MC2?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian J. Teague

Brian J. Teague John H. Thomas, P.C.536 Granite AvenueRichmond, VA 23226UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COAXIAL ELECTRICAL CABLE FOR CABLE TELEVISION AND NETWORKINGEXPIRED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 31, 2012CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Apr 20, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 23, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 23, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 28, 2009C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 16, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 12, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 21, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 21, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Nov 19, 2007E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 9, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 29, 2002R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 6, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 17, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 3, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 27, 2000CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 30, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance