USPTO serial 75454840
PARADISO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PARADISO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Itochu Fashion System Kabushiki Kaisha (ITOCHU FASHION SYSTEM CO., LTD.)
Chuo-ku, Osaka, JP
Other trademarks owned by Itochu Fashion System Kabushiki Kaisha (ITOCHU FASHION SYSTEM CO., LTD.)
Itochu Fashion System Kabushiki Kaisha (ITOCHU FASHION SYSTEM CO., LTD.)
Chuo-ku, Osaka, JP
Other trademarks owned by Itochu Fashion System Kabushiki Kaisha (ITOCHU FASHION SYSTEM CO., LTD.)
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CURTIS B HAMRE
CURTIS B HAMRE MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | golf caps, polo shirts, vests, socks, golf shoes, trousers, skirts, jackets, belts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Itochu Fashion System Kabushiki Kaisha (ITOCHU FASHION SYSTEM CO., LTD.)
- Other trademarks owned by Itochu Fashion System Kabushiki Kaisha (ITOCHU FASHION SYSTEM CO., LTD.)
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named PARADISO
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 18, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |