Drawing for HDTV GLUE

USPTO serial 75455346

HDTV GLUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HDTV GLUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK B EISEN

MARK B EISEN DIMOCK STRATTON CLARIZIO20 QUEEN ST W STE 3202BOX 102TORONTO, ON M5H 3R3

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical and electronic apparatus for use in television standards conversion, television picture manipulation and special effects, and video apparatus for television studios, namely, video processing amplifiers, vertical interval processors, digital frame synchronizers and line synchronizers, video distribution amplifiers, pulse distribution amplifiers, audio distribution amplifiers, digital signal distribution amplifiers, audio/video switchers and control panels therefor, computer based digital video recording/playback units, audio/video router modules, audio and video multiplexers and demultiplexers, synchronizing pulse generators, video, audio and digital test signal generators, logo and ID generators, time code generators, converters and modules for inserting codes into program video, digital equipment for storage, file sorting and assembly, retrieval and playback of multiple field television images, television, video and audio standard/format converters and audio/video signal converters, encoders, decoders and transcoders, digital standard, signal and format converters, parallel to serial converters and serial to parallel converters and operating software for the aforesaid waresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 14, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 15, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 19, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 8, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2001CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2000CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 8, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 5, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 30, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 7, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 4, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance