USPTO serial 75455462
HERITAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HERITAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
82041 Deisenhofen, DE
82041 Deisenhofen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN A PENDORF
STEPHEN A PENDORF PENDORF & CUTLIFFP O BOX 20445TAMPA, FL 33622-0445UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | capital investment consultation concerning companies manufacturing or selling services and/or products that maintain or enhance the earth in an ecologically sound and environmentally friendly way, namely, credit consultancy, credit bureaus, safe deposit box services, real estate and housing management, insurance brokerage, investing the funds of other businesses, insurance underwriting, mutual fund investing and management of trust accounts and endowments for non-profit organizations | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | providing instruction and training and correspondence courses, and publishing for others' books, newspapers, and journals all concerning the philosophy of respect for all living things and about companies with employees, products and services that maintain or enhance the earth in an ecologically sound and environmentally friendly way | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |