USPTO serial 75455702
ALLTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PACIOUS, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALLTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES P HANRATH
JAMES P HANRATH MUCH SHELIST FREED DENENBERG191 N WACKER DR STE 1800CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services; namely, computer network implementation project management, involving preparation of vendor requests for information and requests for procurement proposals, vendor coordination, scheduling and escalation | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation and maintenance of computer hardware for the implementation of computer hardware equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | training in the use of computer network systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer consulting and technical services in the fields of computers, data processing and application, networking, system integration and global computer information network services; namely, computer network planning, auditing, design; system software implementation, administration, support, management, and maintenance involving technology audits, network capacity analysis and consulting using network user traffic studies, analysis, baselining, and user projections, trending analysis and modeling analysis; WAN/LAN design; namely network server, workstation and networking equipment and software configuration design; computer software and hardware selection and configuration for networks, cabling systems, LAN/WAN internetworking equipment, servers, workstations, and associated peripherals interoperability lab testing, platform engineering and premise wiring design and assessment; gateway configuration and development of network security systems; computer network troubleshooting and computer disaster contingency recovery planning | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AllTech Data Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AllTech Data Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ALLTECH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 10, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |