USPTO serial 75455887
LEVEL 3 TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEVEL 3 TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LON A LICATA
LON A LICATA FRASER STRYKER VAUGHN, ET AL500 ENERGY PLZ409 S 17TH STOMAHA, NE 68102-2663Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs to enable the transmission of information over a fiber optic network for the purpose of providing telecommunications services, namely, voice telephone and long distance services, facsimile and data transmission services | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation of telecommunication systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Communications services, namely, providing network access points through which information on the global computer information network passes from one global computer information network service provider to another; providing multiple user access to a global computer information network; telecommunications services, namely voice telephone local and long distance services, facsimile, and data transmission services; telecommunication services, namely, voice mail services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design of telecommunication systems for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LEVEL 3 TECHNOLOGIES
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |