USPTO serial 75455896
RIVER CITY CHICKEN COMPANY EXCLUSIVELY AT RCC GIANT EAGLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 30, 2003
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RIVER CITY CHICKEN COMPANY EXCLUSIVELY AT RCC GIANT EAGLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PHOENIX INTANGIBLES HOLDING COMPANY
WILMINGTON, DE
Other trademarks owned by PHOENIX INTANGIBLES HOLDING COMPANY
PHOENIX INTANGIBLES HOLDING COMPANY
WILMINGTON, DE
Other trademarks owned by PHOENIX INTANGIBLES HOLDING COMPANY
PHOENIX INTANGIBLES HOLDING COMPANY
WILMINGTON, DE
Other trademarks owned by PHOENIX INTANGIBLES HOLDING COMPANY
Pittsburgh, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID V RADACK
DAVID V RADACK ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLC600 GRANT ST 42ND FLPITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Supermarket services, namely, a supermarket department providing prepared foods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PHOENIX INTANGIBLES HOLDING COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by PHOENIX INTANGIBLES HOLDING COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by PHOENIX INTANGIBLES HOLDING COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by GIANT EAGLE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named RIVER CITY CHICKEN COMPANY EXCLUSIVELY AT RCC GIANT EAGLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |