USPTO serial 75456312
HIGH PLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2810836Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 3, 2004
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HIGH PLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Free Union, VA
Charlottesville, VA
Charlottesville, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur W. Rashap
Arthur W. Rashap Arthur W. Rashap, Attorney at Law4341 Trestle Lake DriveMunnsville, NY 13409UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Seminars, conferences, workshops and competitive athletic events utilizing sports and other physical activities as a transformative and spiritual experience to facilitate teamwork and organizational effectiveness | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 16, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 14, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |