USPTO serial 75456416
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Mechanicsville, VA
Mechanicsville, VA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN P DEMM
STEPHEN P DEMM HUNTON & WILLIAMSRIVERFRONT PLZ E TWR951 E BYRD STRICHMOND, VA 23219-4074| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | alimentary pastes; rice; macaroni and cheese; pasta-based meal preparations; noodles; mayonnaise; salad dressings; spaghetti sauce; barbecue sauce; catsup; mustard; tomato sauce; canned and bottled sauces excluding cranberry and applesauce; vinegar; chocolate syrup; pancake syrup; table and/or topping syrups; coffee; tea bags and instant tea; hot cocoa mix; processed popcorn; breakfast and processed cereals; marshmallows; spices; salt; pepper; baking soda; bagged and boxed sugar; frostings; ice cream | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2001 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |