Drawing for FAMILY VALUE

USPTO serial 75456416

FAMILY VALUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, ROBERT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FAMILY VALUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHEN P DEMM

STEPHEN P DEMM HUNTON & WILLIAMSRIVERFRONT PLZ E TWR951 E BYRD STRICHMOND, VA 23219-4074

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030alimentary pastes; rice; macaroni and cheese; pasta-based meal preparations; noodles; mayonnaise; salad dressings; spaghetti sauce; barbecue sauce; catsup; mustard; tomato sauce; canned and bottled sauces excluding cranberry and applesauce; vinegar; chocolate syrup; pancake syrup; table and/or topping syrups; coffee; tea bags and instant tea; hot cocoa mix; processed popcorn; breakfast and processed cereals; marshmallows; spices; salt; pepper; baking soda; bagged and boxed sugar; frostings; ice creamACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2001ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jul 10, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 3, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 29, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 12, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 4, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance