Drawing for DPS GRAVITY

USPTO serial 75456730

DPS GRAVITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DPS GRAVITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK B EISEN

MARK B EISEN DIMOCK STRATTON CLARIZIO LLP20 QUEEN ST W STE 3202BOX 102TORONTO, ON M5H 3R3

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware and software for film and video editing and compositing which includes special effects, character generation, paint and animation, audio editing, audio effects, film and video project management, and post project management, and post production edit list and shot log import, export, format translation, list manipulation, new list generation, video to film cut list translation, cut list manipulation and exportACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 3, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 7, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 7, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 7, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 15, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 14, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 10, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance