USPTO serial 75457016
INJEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COFIELD, JULIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INJEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William Christie
WILLIAM CHRISTIE CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPP O BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | NEEDLE-FREE MEDICAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; NAMELY, NEEDLE-FREE INJECTORS, DISPOSABLE NEEDLE-FREE AMPULES, COCKING AND CARRYING CASES FOR NEEDLE-FREE INJECTORS, FLUID TRANSFER COUPLERS, AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 18, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |