USPTO serial 75457287
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SIEMENS LOGISTICS AND ASSEMBLY SYSTEMS, INC.
GRAND RAPIDS, MI
Other trademarks owned by SIEMENS LOGISTICS AND ASSEMBLY SYSTEMS, INC.
GRAND RAPIDS, MI
Mannesmann Dematic Rapistan Corp.
Grand Rapids, MI
Mannesmann Dematic Rapistan Corp.
Grand Rapids, MI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL VAN DYKE
DANIEL VAN DYKE VAN DYKE GARDNER LINN & BURKHART LLPP O BOX 888695GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49588-8695UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Automated material handling machines and electronic controller therefor sold as a unit | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 30, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 16, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |