USPTO serial 75457353
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
Santa Monica, CA
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THERESA W. MIDDLEBROOK
THERESA W MIDDLEBROOK WAGNER MIDDLEBROOK & KIMBELL LLP3541 OCEAN VIEW BLVDGLENDALE, CA 91208UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING AUDIO SIGNAL DATA EMBEDDED IN ANY AUDIO ENABLED MEDIA INCLUDING TELEVISION, RADIO, PRERECORDED AUDIO AND VIDEO TAPES AND DISCS, REAL AUDIO BROADCAST VIA THE WORLDWIDE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, MP3 AND WAV WHICH CONTAINING INSTRUCTIONS TO LAUNCH URL'S, RUN SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS AND OPEN AUDIO, VIDEO, OR DATA FILES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2000 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |