USPTO serial 75457481
CONVICTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVY, MICHAEL S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONVICTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAUREL V DINEFF
LAUREL V DINEFF HOFFMANN & DINEFF LTD820 W JACKSON BLVD STE 370CHICAGO, IL 60607UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumery and cosmetics, namely, essential oils for personal use; hair products, namely, shampoos, conditioners, hair sprays, gels, rinses and lotions; soaps, bath salts moisturizing and cleansing lotions for the hands, body and face; makeup remover, eye make up, foundation, facial makeup; skin creams, sunscreen and tanning lotions, tanning sprays and gels for the face and body; eau de cologne and toilet waters; perfumes; body deodorant; shaving balm, cream, gel and lotion | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 1999 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 1998 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |