USPTO serial 75457540
DEVICE TOOLBOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 20, 2001
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DEVICE TOOLBOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MILPITAS, CA
Westwood, MA
Westwood, MA
MILPITAS, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES L GAGNEBIN
Lisa Greenwald-Swire Heller Ehrman LLP275 Middlefield RoadMenlo Park, CA 94025-3506UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software used to provide central recipe storage and to create, edit, and save recipe files regarding semiconductor wafer data and to manage multiple machine configurations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by ADE Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by ADE Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DEVICE TOOLBOX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 30, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 31, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 1, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |