Drawing for EXTERMINATOR ANTI VIRUS

USPTO serial 75457575

EXTERMINATOR ANTI VIRUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2305439Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 4, 2000
Examiner
O'HARA, CHAD
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXTERMINATOR ANTI VIRUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ELIZABETH V CARDOZA

MULTIPLE ACCESS CA CORPORATION43195 MISSION BLVD STE B-2FREMONT, CA 94539UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in identifying, detecting, preventing and removing computer viruses; and instruction manuals and user documentation sold as a unit therewithSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2005C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Apr 1, 2005CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 9, 2005CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Dec 2, 2004PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 4, 2000R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 12, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 11, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance