USPTO serial 75457709
POMERANTZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2424149Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 23, 2001
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with POMERANTZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Davenport, IA
Davenport, IA
GARDEN CITY, NY
GARDEN CITY, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John G. Tutunjian
John G. Tutunjian Tutunjian & Bitetto, P.C.425 Broadhollow RoadSuite 302Melville, NY 11747Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | photographic albums, letter racks, letter trays, organizers for stationery use, personal organizers, calendar holders, photographic storage boxes, 2-3 drawer file boxes for stationery use, bulletin boards, cookbook holders, file sorters, dry erase boards and growth charts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 6, 1997 |
| 020 | furniture, namely, shelves, kitchen shelves, pictures frames, folding screens, single panel screens, room dividers, bed desks, 6-drawer storage boxes, small storage cubes, shadow boxes, 2-3 drawer filing cabinets and magazine racks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 6, 1997 |
| 021 | household and kitchen goods, namely, wooden serving platters, wooden bowls and plates, wooden salad bowls, bread boxes, paper towel holders, banana hangers, napkin holders, coasters not of paper and not being table linen, mug trees, wooden bagel slicer, trivets, folding dish racks, recipe boxes, cutlery trays not of precious metal, salad sets comprised of salad bowl, serving bowls and servers, flatware caddies, revolving holder with kitchen utensils such as parer, can opener, whisk and spatula, lazy susans, spice racks and canister sets, chip and dip sets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 6, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JP PRODUCTS, L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by JP PRODUCTS, L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by LIFETIME BRANDS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LIFETIME BRANDS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named POMERANTZ
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 9, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 18, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |