USPTO serial 75458181
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
871 45 Harnosand, SE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Kenney
ROBERT J KENNEY BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCHP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | NAUTICAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC AND OPTICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, INSTRUMENTS AND EQUIPMENT FOR MONITORING AND DIRECTING THE POSITION OF VEHICLES ON LAND, AT SEA AND IN THE AIR; APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR MEASURING, SIGNALING AND NAVIGATIONS, NAMELY INSTRUMENTS AND EQUIPMENT FOR MONITORING AND DIRECTING THE LOCATION OF VEHICLES ON LAND, AT SEA AND IN THE AIR; APPARATUS FOR RECORDING, TRANSMISSION AND REPRODUCTION OF SOUND IMAGES, NAMELY INSTRUMENTS AND EQUIPMENT FOR MONITORING AND DIRECTING THE LOCATION OF VEHICLES ON LANK, AT SEA AND IN THE AIR; AUTOMATIC CONTROL APPARATUS FOR VEHICLES, NAMELY INSTRUMENTS AND EQUIPMENT FOR MONITORING AND DIRECTING THE LOCATION OF VEHICLES ON LAND, AT SEA AND IN THE AIR; RADIO AND TELECOMMUNICATION TRANSMITTERS; MONITORING APPARATUS, NAMELY, INSTRUMENTS AND EQUIPMENT FOR MONITORING AND DIRECTING THE POSITION OF VEHICLES ON LAND, AT SEA AND IN THE AIR; APPARATUS FOR VEHICLES LOCATION, NAMELY, INSTRUMENTS AND EQUIPMENT FOR MONITORING AND DIRECTING THE LOCATION OF VEHICLES ON LAND, AT SEA AND IN THE AIR; COMPUTERS; DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT COMPRISING COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR DETECTION, COMMUNICATION, SECURITY CONTROL, NAVIGATIONAL, LOCALIZATION, SIGNALING AND MEASURING PURPOSES; ANTENNAS; RADIO MASTS; APPARATUS, NAMELY FOR DISTANCE MEASUREMENT; IMAGE SCANNERS, DETECTORS, NAMELY INSTRUMENTS AND EQUIPMENT FOR DETECTING THE LOCATION AND DIRECTION OF VEHICLES ON LAND, AT SEA AN IN THE AIR; ELECTRICAL AND OPTICAL CONDUCTORS; ELECTRO-DYNAMIC APPARATUS FOR REMOTE CONTROL OF SIGNALS; REMOTE CONTROL APPARATUS FOR VEHICLES ON LAND, AT SEA AND IN THE AIR; ELECTRICAL CONTROL CONSOLES; LASERS, NOT FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; MONITORS; MODEMS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |