Drawing for DOT COM DOT COMMUNICATIONS

USPTO serial 75458438

DOT COM DOT COMMUNICATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CRAWFORD, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOT COM DOT COMMUNICATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SETH M NEHRBASS

SETH M NEHRBASS GARVEY SMITH NEHRBASS & DOODY L L C3838 N CAUSEWAY BLVD STE 3290METAIRIE, LA 70002-8350UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunications services, namely, local telephone services, long distance telephone services, paging services, beeper services, personal communication services (PCS), cellular telephone services, digital telephone services, cable television broadcasting, cable television transmission, global computer network access services, and integrated services digital network (ISDN) linesACTIVE—
042Alarm monitoring services, namely, fire alarm monitoring and burglar monitoring; providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network for the transfer and dissemination a wide range of informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 29, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 19, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance