USPTO serial 75458462
PEEI PITTSBURGH ELECTRIC ENGINES, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PEEI PITTSBURGH ELECTRIC ENGINES, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J KLINE
JENIFER C SLINSKEY THORP REED & ARMSTRONG, LLP14TH FLONE OXFORD CTR 301 GRANT STPITTSBURGH, PA 15219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Turbo fuel cell engines for mobile power applications in the nature of electric power generation for marine propulsion and ship service electrical loads, electric power generation for onboard utility service for land vehicles such as trains, and portable electric power generators such as those for use at temporary construction sites, in disaster emergency situations, and for military battlefield applications | ACTIVE | Sep 12, 2002 |
| 012 | Turbo fuel cell engines for land vehicles | ACTIVE | Sep 12, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pittsburgh Electric Engines, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pittsburgh Electric Engines, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named PEEI PITTSBURGH ELECTRIC ENGINES, INC.
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 8, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 14, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |