Drawing for MEAT-RAGEOUS EXTREME

USPTO serial 75458599

MEAT-RAGEOUS EXTREME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEAT-RAGEOUS EXTREME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK B HARRISON

MARK B HARRISON SPENCER & FRANK1100 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 300 EWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3955UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030PIZZA AND PASTA FOR CONSUMPTION ON OR OFF THE PREMISESACTIVE—
042RESTAURANT SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 30, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 30, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 21, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 29, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 11, 2000REINREINSTATED—
Aug 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 15, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 14, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance