USPTO serial 75458899
MAPPCOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 15, 2000
- Examiner
- SWITZER, SANDY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAPPCOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Paul, MN
St. Paul, MN
ROSEVILLE, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GERALD E. HELGET
GERALD E. HELGET BRIGGS AND MORGAN, P.A.80 South Eighth Street2200 IDS CenterMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | engineering support services, namely, providing modeling, data collection and analysis, load and capability reporting, and computer communications system support in the electric utility industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 28, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2006 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| May 31, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 23, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |