USPTO serial 75459430
SERVICE QUALITY RESULTS STORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2367481Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 18, 2000
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SERVICE QUALITY RESULTS STORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID L GRIGG JR
DAVID L GRIGG JR MORTON GRIGG AND PHILLIPS LLPP O BOX 519ALBEMARLE, NC 28002-0519UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TESTING AND MEASURING EQUIPMENT FOR USE IN TESTING THE PERFORMANCE AND EFFICIENCY OF POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, ISOKINETIC COAL SAMPLERS, DIRTY-AIR VELOCITY PROBES, FLUE-INSERTED FLYASH SAMPLER, FORWARD-REVERSE PITOT TUBE, COARSE PARTICLE GUIDE CLASSIFER BLADES, AND AIRFLOW MEASURING DEVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 1993 |
| 037 | TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF POWER PLANT ENGINEERING, NAMELY, TESTING AND EVALUATION OF POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE AND EFFICIENCY OF SUCH EQUIPMENT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Storm Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Storm Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Storm Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named SERVICE QUALITY RESULTS STORM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |