USPTO serial 75459595
THE BIBLE TOLD AS ONE STORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE BIBLE TOLD AS ONE STORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Nashville, TN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD D LANQUIST JR
EDWARD D LANQUIST JR WADDEY & PATTERSON PCSTE 2020 NATIONSBANK PLZ414 UNION STNASHVILLE, TN 37219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Prerecorded compact discs featuring readings of Bible stories and/or music; Prerecorded compact discs featuring videographic dramatizations of Bible stories and/or music videos; Prerecorded video tapes featuring dramatizations of Bible stories and/or music videos; Prerecorded audio cassettes featuring readings of Bible stories and/or music; CD ROM featuring computer operating software | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Religious books; Calendars; Puzzles | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Children's games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |