USPTO serial 75459644
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JUDY KRUGER
JUDY KRUGER BRACEWELL & PATTERSON LLPS TWR PENNZOIL PL711 LOUISIANA ST STE 2900HOUSTON, TX 77002-2781| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Impervious membranes, namely, a polymer-modified asphalt emulsion for use in containment protection and barriers for and against solids, fuilds, and gases for general industrial use | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 25, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |