USPTO serial 75459692
BLIZZARD BOOTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ISAACSON, GINNY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLIZZARD BOOTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BERNHARD P MOLLDREM JR
BERNHARD P MOLLDREM JR TRAPANI & MOLLDREMMONROE BLDG 2ND FL333 ONONDAGA STSYRACUSE, NY 13202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | (Based on Intent to Use) All purpose sports bags, garment bags for travel, duffel bags, traveling bags, beach bags, carryall bags, brief cases, shopping bags of leather, mesh and textile materials, hand and shoulder bags, school bags; rucksacks; umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) and (Based on 44(e)) Footwear; boots, shoes, slippers, sandals; sports shoes, sports boots, ski boots, beach shoes, half-boots, lace boots, bath sandals, bath slippers; articles of clothing, namely-- coats, jackets, suits, trousers, waist coats, shirts, blouses, T-shirts, sweatshirts, ski wear, shorts, skirts, dresses, pullovers, sweaters, robes, sleepwear, nightdresses, pajamas, swimwear, neckties, scarves, singlets, vests, socks, hosiery, leggings, underwear, all for men, ladies, and children; rainwear, gloves; headwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lambert Howarth & Sons Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Lambert Howarth & Sons Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named BLIZZARD BOOTS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |