USPTO serial 75459727
GRAND MAYAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRAND MAYAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT R ERIKSON
SCOTT R ERIKSON INTERSERVE BUSINESS SERVICES INC4104 SAVANNAH CTCOLLEYVILLE, TX 76034UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | hotel and resort hotel services | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Desarrollo Marina Vallarta, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Desarrollo Marina Vallarta, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GRAND MAYAN
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 4, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 4, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |